Tester Focus Should be on Crash the Application
While intentionally attempting to crash an application can be a valid testing strategy in certain contexts, it’s essential to clarify that the primary goal of software testing is not to crash the application but to ensure the software meets its requirements, functions correctly, and behaves as expected under various conditions.
Here are some considerations regarding intentionally crashing an application during testing:
Stability and Reliability: The main aim of testing is to ensure the stability and reliability of the software. Intentionally causing the application to crash may not align with these goals.
Negative Testing: While it’s important to conduct negative testing to identify how the application handles unexpected inputs or scenarios, the objective is not necessarily to crash the application but to observe how it responds and recovers from such situations.
User Experience: Crashing an application during testing may not provide a realistic representation of the user experience. In real-world scenarios, users expect applications to handle errors gracefully and provide informative error messages rather than crashing abruptly.
Risk of Data Loss or Corruption: Crashing an application might lead to potential data loss or corruption. In a production environment, such behavior is highly undesirable and could result in a poor user experience.
Security Implications: Intentionally crashing an application might have security implications, especially if the crash reveals vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious users.
While it’s important to explore the boundaries of an application and assess its resilience to adverse conditions, testers should focus on a more comprehensive approach, including positive testing, negative testing, security testing, and other relevant testing techniques. The goal is to identify and address issues that could impact the functionality, security, and usability of the software without necessarily causing the application to crash.